Showing posts with label success. Show all posts
Showing posts with label success. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

You Are Human First: Reframing Identity, Success, and Failure

This guest post was written by post-academic Christine Slocum, who blogs at Seattleite from Syracuse. 

Remember, you are human first.


Academia and graduate school are greedy institutions, demanding a large portion of time and life. When this portion has been carved out, cultivated, and lived for a long time, one’s identity can be colored by it. Worse, one’s identity can be outlined, folded, and shaded by academia if you spend a long enough time in the socialization process. Perhaps once this was welcomed, but I suspect that it may not be now if you are at this web site. That is OK.


Marx thought human’s species-being and the meaning in their life is tied to what they do. Therefore, the means of production is the key to both human oppression and liberation. Not owning the fruits of one’s labor and being able to exercise their creativity was to be alienated from their self. While socialism is hardly a common feature of American thought, identifying one’s self with their work is common in American culture. One is a journalist. One is a mother. One is a professor. All of these definitions involve specific activities. Rarely does one describe their self simply as being instead of the dominant features of their doing.


I would argue that “being” is a good place to center yourself in the midst of a transition.


Mystical ViewCreative Commons License Hartwig HKD via Compfight


Leaving graduate school has three steps: deciding it’s not working, leaving, and doing something new. This is far easier if your doing and being are distinct entities. Otherwise, how do you determine what that third step will be? If your self was your activity, your sense of self evaporates when your activity does. You are not just imagining a new path, you may be imagining a new you. How daunting.


Remember, you are human first.


Many facets of identity are relational, as though it was not enough to simply exist. I am going to say that you are alright just as you are. You have inherent worth and dignity, independent of how you have spent your days and how others treated you as you did so. Beyond your dissertation or thesis, beyond your papers, conferences, and students, you are human first. When you wake up in the morning, you are a living, breathing person. You need to eat. You need sleep. You need shelter from the elements. You need companionship and relationships. Eventually you will die. These needs are independent of graduate school and academia.


Humans are animals, if social and smart ones who are quick to construct complicated worlds around ourselves. We aspire to the privileged worlds that take for granted the dirty basics of human life. The purpose of the life of the mind is to elevate it above the body. Perhaps you are inclined as an intellectual, but I guarantee you are a corporeal being. Your mind is located in your body, separated from the broader world. Your experiences are possessions, they are not ways to define you. You may identify as a former graduate student, but I say think of yourself as a person who chose something different.


Academia is not the ocean or mountains. Academia is a social institution. It only exists because it was invented to by human beings. Academia could be viewed through the lens of a social fact, in that it is beyond and outside individuals and subjects them to constraints. Of course, it is also comprised of individuals who could form and change it (except they feel powerless to do so and thus buy in). Often the values surrounding Americans are the capitalistic ones of materials and profit. The ones in academia are of reputation, prestige, and elitism. Nonetheless currency, if it’s not the monetary sort. The goal in both places is to accumulate the most currency. If you spend enough time in the academic world, you are bound to relate to those as laudable goals. Maybe your identity was tied into richness as an academic: being a scholar, being a published researcher, or the aspiration thereof. Perhaps you spent your sunny days inside, your holidays away, and your weekends at the keyboard being this goal. Perhaps leaving has the taste of a businessperson closing their shop: failure, inviting a sort of poverty from an opportunity unsuccessfully capitalized upon.


Remember, you are human first.


The first step for me to leave graduate school was to treat it like a job. This is a common strategy suggested to create a work-life balance and to keep yourself on track. I have had many jobs, and the feature I tended to value most was the time in-between. Jobs were things I did, not things I were. This inoculated me from becoming too much of a graduate student and kept my focus on doing graduate school.


Once graduate school became something I did, my struggles and failures became easier to accept (even if I was, overall, pretty good at playing the role of graduate student), because failing did not reflect on me, it reflected on what I did. My sense of self was distinct. Success or failure became a possession, not a feature of my identity. When I started viewing myself with the same care and concern I would give to others, it was easier to disentangle graduate school from my life.


Remember, you are human first. The odds you would have conceived are slim, but here you are. You are lucky. You are valuable no matter what you do; you have inherent worth and dignity as a human being. Academia may have failed, but something else won’t. It may take awhile to find out what that something else is. That’s OK. Struggle is OK. You will be fine, just remember to take care of yourself.


Mary Oliver asks, “What is it you plan to do / with your one wild and precious life?” in “The Summer Day.” Before all things, you are a living, breathing person with a gift of time in front of you. If you are living then you are not failing; you are doing alright. Move into your chosen direction, be it staying or leaving, and accept your living self unconditionally. You are human first, and what a success you are.

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Reframing Leaving, Quitting, and Failure (especially for "type 2" leavers)

Often the decision to leave academia can be accompanied by feelings of failure. If you choose to pursue an advanced degree, chances are you are intelligent, hard-working, driven, and accustomed to success. You have embraced the idea that persistence will pay off. For you, quitting is not an option. Quitting is for those other, lesser, mortals.

In fact, academia encourages this kind of thinking--you live a life of the mind, you brilliant little snowflake. And, after hearing this pervasive rhetoric for countless years of graduate study, it can be difficult to "detox" from it.

In Thomas H. Benton's (aka William Pannapacker) "The Big Lie About the Life of the Mind"  he succinctly describes why choosing to leave academia can be such a colossal mindfuck,




Graduate school in the humanities is a trap. It is designed that way. It is structurally based on limiting the options of students and socializing them into believing that it is shameful to abandon "the life of the mind." That's why most graduate programs resist reducing the numbers of admitted students or providing them with skills and networks that could enable them to do anything but join the ever-growing ranks of impoverished, demoralized, and damaged graduate students and adjuncts for whom most of academe denies any responsibility.



But as Dr. Karen reminds us over at The Professor Is In, IT'S OK TO QUIT:




It is ok to decide that’s not what you want.  It is ok to make another choice.  There is life outside of academia.  But academia is a kind of cult, and deviation from the normative values of the group is not permitted or accepted within its walls.  You will be judged harshly by others and, to the extent you’ve been properly socialized into the cult during graduate school, by your own inner voices.  Making the decision to leave involves confronting that judgment, working through it, and coming out the other side.  It is long and hard and involves confronting profound shame.  I went through this.  I know.



If you feel ashamed by your decision to quit, you are not alone. Since leaving academia, I have struggled with doubt, insecurity, and feelings of failure. Feelings of failure may be particularly intense if you are a "Type 2" postacademic. At From Grad School to Happiness, JC writes about the two kinds of postacademics, Type 1 and Type 2 leavers. She says,"The first category contains people like me, who have really had it with academia [...] The second category would be people who still love academia, but who know that their ability to get a job that pays them a fair wage in an area they'd like to live is severely hampered by the academic job market or some other factor."


Type 2 leavers may find the decision to leave academia particularly fraught, as they did not "quit" academia so much as academia quit them. As a Type 2 leaver, your decision to pursue a life outside of the ivory tower may feel less like a positive affirmation to leave an unhealthy environment and more like a "failure" to land an academic job.

Regardless of how and why you decide to leave academia, be proud. If you've decided to leave because you're miserable doing the work, you're consciously choosing to make yourself happier. That's something to be proud of. And if you're leaving because you can't make a reliable living doing what you love, you're consciously choosing to give yourself the kind of security you need as an adult, and choosing to stop allowing academia to exploit you. That is also a decision of which you should be very, very proud.

The process of reframing your decision to quit and re-calibrating how you define successf, failure, and a worthy endeavor is not easy and takes guts. You'll have ups and downs, and you'll struggle with it, and you'll second guess yourself. But that doesn't mean that you're making the wrong decision. It means that you've been socialized a certain way, and now you need to re-socialize yourself to think differently about what "quitting" means in the realm of academia.

As you go through the good, bad, and ugly process of redefining personal accomplishment, please keep these helpful links in mind:

For an entertaining look at the career of successful television and, not so successful film actor, Alec Baldwin read here. A self-described failure, this article chronicles how after numerous dubious professional and personal choices, Baldwin is at the top of his game at the age of 51.

Also, take a listen to this podcast from Freakonomics on The Upside of Quitting:

To help us understand quitting, we look at a couple of key economic concepts in this episode: sunk cost and opportunity cost. Sunk cost is about the past – it’s the time or money or sweat equity you’ve put into a job or relationship or a project, and which makes quitting hard. Opportunity cost is about the future. It means that for every hour or dollar you spend on one thing, you’re giving up the opportunity to spend that hour or dollar on something else – something that might make your life better. If only you weren’t so worried about the sunk cost. If only you could …. quit.



A fascinating collection of stories "ranging from prostitutes and baseball players to former government officials and a couple of Amish women who left the fold," The Upside of Quitting reminds us that quitting can be a strategic decision, if we only embrace the opportunity cost of change.


 Quitting is a powerful choice. Embrace it.